![]() |
Shakespeare in the AlleyShow five--Ballads, part ii |
|
SHAKESPEARE IN THE ALLEY: BALLADS Part 2
But let me remind you where we stopped last week. I closed with a plaintive ballad of a dream that is all too real, so when the dreamer awakens, he cannot shake free of its meaning. The dream presents the dreamer (and us) with a figure who calls us to arise, a prophet-like figure.
We have here the archetypal prophet calling us to repent, to repent from the sin of demanding blood. Dylan’s St. Augustine calls us to transcend our need for martyrs, our need to have a sacrificial lamb. But the dreamer in his dream does not heed the call. Instead, he finds himself “among the ones who put [St. Augustine] out to death.”
Yes, the speaker’s dream protrays him as the embodiment of our tendency to put to death the prophet who calls us to arise from our mundane existence to the fulfillment of life’s potential. It is not a tendency restricted to Americans, but it is one clearly present in the American tradition. From Abraham Lincoln to JFK, from Patrick Henry’s “Give me liberty or give me death” to Martin Luther King, Jr’s “I’ve been to the mountaintop”—not to mention those in the public eye as Dylan grew up such as James Dean and Buddy Holly, there is an American propensity to create martyrs. There were many who thought that perhaps Dylan’s motorcycle accident in 1966 would end in his becoming a martyr figure. No wonder the idea was on his mind as he mediated in seclusion for over year. While Americans were watching live coverage of Vietnam on TV every night, Dylan was looking at the American situation as part of the eternal rather than the transitory. Having withdrawn from the world of sex, drugs and rock'n’roll after his 1966 motorcycle accident, Dylan had been doing some soul-searching. Not that he hadn’t been before, but in this album we see him turn from the joker into the thief, from the mocking bird into the moderate man. But for now, let’s keep our focus on Dylan’s use of the ballad form and turn our attention to the longest ballad on the John Wesley Harding album, the strange tale which Dylan calls "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest."
This is a ballad with some strange images, although anyone who has looked out the window while flying over the America plains probably knows about the “plotted plain.” A footstool above such a place would indeed be mythic in scope. The ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest is, like many traditional ballads, mythic, but more self-consciously so.
Like the joker in “All Along the Watchtower,” Frankie Lee is confused. He has lost his orientation, his sense of direction, his sense of values, his sense of identity. Like Chaplin's little tramp or Schultz's Charlie Brown, Frankie Lee is an everymodernman, plagued by feelings of insignificance and inadequacy, but this story, unlike Chaplin’s, is not a comedy. Frankie Lee, as the tragic hero always must, pays for his mistakes. He thinks the solution to his problems is money. But when Judas “pulls out a roll of tens,” Frankie Lee feels guilty: "Would you please not stare at me. . ." he says . He is tempted by the money, but he doesn’t want anyone watching. It’s fine to be obsessed with money in America, but we don’t anyone to notice.
“I don’t’ call it anything,” says Frankie Lee. Of course not. Modern America has moved away from the eternal and the spiritual to focus on the immediate and the monetary. Frankie Lee is a material man who lives in a material land. So, exit Judas Priest, leaving good ole Frankie Lee to ponder the roll of tens.
Frankie Lee’s father is deceased: for him God the father is dead and eternity something he does not even name. He is a gambler, but he is betting on the wrong side of Pascal’s wager. Judas Priest, unlike the thief in "All Along the Watchtower," offers not spiritual but material comfort: he pulls out a roll of tens. He proves to be a seducer, like the fair damsel in chains from “As I Walked Out One Morning,” though better disguised than she. He reminds me of a character in “Desolation Row”: "The phantom of the opera/ In the perfect image of a priest.” He offers Frankie Lee money, but is it because of friendship?
Frankie Lee loses control of that which he had made to the sound of the mission bells. In his weakness and loss of control, Frankie turns easily from making money to making women, from, as it were, the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism to the Playboy Ethic and the Sensualism of flesh. Like Oscar Wilde, Frankie can resist anything except temptation. In this he is the opposite of Christ, of course, but there are strange parallels which suggest this comparison. Most obviously the name of his betrayer suggests a comparison to Jesus, but there are other details. First, his father is "deceased": Nietzsche declared that God is dead in the late 19th century, but it wasn’t a fully integrated part of the American popular culture until 1966 when Time magazine’s covered shouted, Is God dead? Second, he "died of thirst," alluding not only to Christ’s thirst on the cross but to the need for that water which Christ offered to the woman at the well, the eternal water after which we never thirst again. And third, as we see in the next verse, his death is accompanied by jest.
Frankie Lee is not the usual literary Christ-figure whose death is redemptive for others. His death does not produce a martyr. He stands in contrast to Christ. As we were told in "I Dreamed I Saw St. Augustine," "no martyr is among us now." We are not made to despise but to pity Frankie Lee because he lacks the inner resources to cope with "the modern situation." And perhaps that other tragic emotion which Aristotle said is evoked when we watch the tragic hero pay for his mistake: fear that we are perhaps a little like him. Frankie Lee dies of thirst in Judas's arms because Judas Priest does not have that eternal water to offer: he is a false priest. Likewise, Frankie Lee is not a martyr but a victim. The hour is late; we are in the latter days when there is no martyr among us and no revelation.
Even the finest literary ballad written in English, "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner," ends with an overt statement of moral. After telling his long tale of death at sea caused by his killing an albatross, the ancient mariner closes with this moral: "He prayeth best who loveth best,/Both man and bird and beast. . . ." It is not this simplistic moral, however, which causes the Wedding Guest to awaken the next day "a sadder and a wiser man." Rather I would suggest that the presence of an overtly stated moral has freed his intellect from questions about meaning so that during the night his subconscious could ingest the mythic narrative itself of the Mariner "Alone, alone, all, all alone, alone on a wide wide sea." Coleridge gives us (and the wedding guest) the moral in order to provide a surface meaning which satisfies the conscious mind; this frees the unconscious to work in the depths, to look directly at the images. “The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest” works like this. I have often quoted the moral that’s tacked on here: “One should never be where one does not belong.” But the power of this mythic ballad is more to be found in the narrative of the everymodernman figure whose quest for money and women ends in the arms of Judas Priest which is where he dies—of thirst. ~AMERICAN IN THE 70’S: “LILY, ROSEMARY AND THE JACK OF HEARTS Blood on the Tracks followed a period of seven years in which there were no albums which had the power of those released in the mid-sixties, so it was quickly hailed as a sign that the creative genius had returned, just as happened again in 1997 when Time Out of Mind appeared. Of course part of the reason for this elation from his audience is the fact that the outlaw fits our image of the artist as rebel, as outsider, as joker much better than the moderate family man. The Romantic image of the artist dominates our imagination. Alexander Pope, that neo-classical poet of the eighteenth century, described the role of the poet as expressing “what oft was thought but ne’er so well expressed.” That role, however, was replaced by the image of the wild-eyed Romantic which Coleridge describes in “Kubla Khan,” the artist who “has drunk the milk of paradise” and fed on honey dew. This is what allows him to see visions and dream dreams. And in Blood on the Tracks Dylan has turned away from the moderate, classical mode back to that mode we tend to expect of the artist. All three share certain key features: they use a repeated line to end every verse, what ballad scholars call an “incremental refrain.” As the story progresses, each repetition of the phrase increases and multiplies the meaning of what, to begin with, seems a simple enough phrase, almost a cliché: “simple twist of fate” or “tangled up in blue” or, most inigmatically, “the jack of hearts.” A second feature shared by all three of these ballads is tight structure. Despite their length, Dylan’s use of intricate rhyme schemes and narrative elements which double as symbolic imagery makes every detail tightly woven into the narrative. Finally, all three ballads relate to the album's central theme of human separation and “radical solitude,” that concept from the Spanish philosopher Ortega which I used in the first two shows. Indeed, every song on the album examines this theme to a painful degree. Its title, Blood on the Tracks, is not without significance, though today with CDs the meaning of “tracks” may be different, since the tracks on records, the grooves, don’t exist on CDs. But they do have “tracks” for each song. And of course Dylan is playing off the old western song “Blood on the Saddle” –and, of course, on railroad tracks, for trains are everywhere in Dylan’s songs. Two of these ballads present contemporary scenes. Both “Tangled Up in Blue” and “Simple Twist of Fate” disguise their mythic quality by a veneer of contemporary realism. The third, however, draws upon America's greatest contribution to world mythology: the western.
The long ballads on Blood on the Tracks demonstrate that the ballad, when produced by a master artist, is still a vital artistic form. On John Wesley Harding Dylan creates highly condensed and evocative ballads which work as symbolic poetry, compressed ballads which lack, as Dylan says, a "traditional sense of time." Songs like “John Wesley Harding” and “As I Went Out One Morning” do not tell a story so much as evoke a myth already known: the myth of the good outlaw, the myth of the naive young man seduced by a femme fatale disguised as a fair damsel, the story of the wronged drifter miraculously saved from the mob's malevolence. In 1968 Dylan seems to have been skeptical about the ballad's potential to compete with movies in telling stories, but on Blood on the Tracks seven years later he has learned to evoke that sense of mystery which makes the old ballads outstanding while at the same time telling a story. He attempted this twice on the earlier album, in the liner notes story of the three kings and in "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest," but neither of those achieves the quality of these three ballads.
Although the longest song on the album, almost eight minutes, "Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts" is exceptionally compact. Its superiority to "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest" indicates another major stage in Dylan's artistic development. It has no strained symbols like the one where Judas Priest places his roll of tens "on a footstool/ Just above the plotted plain"; it has no wasted lines like "'Alright,' said Judas Priest,/ I'll see you after a while.'" There are no "fill in" lines with only narrative function; every word, every image conveys the emotional setting and relates to the central theme while advancing the plot. Nothing can be omitted from the 15 nine-line verses without loss, although if you are interested in seeing Dylan cutting out what is not needed, you can look at the omitted verse, printed in the song book for the album and available on the companion web site, dylanalley dot org.
What is seen and what is not seen is important in this ballad. The central character is himself a rather illusive figure. He has no name, but he looks like the Jack of Hearts. We might compare him to the character Dylan plays in the Sam Peckinpah film Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid who, when asked his name replies, “Alias, just Alias.” This poem was probably started while Dylan was working on that film. But let’s get to the other main characters in this mythic drama. We have the jack; we have yet to meet the two queens and the king:
So one queen is Lily, with a name that perhaps recalls the line from the Gospels: "Consider the lilies of the field; they toil not, neither do they spin . . .." A second queen, Rosemary, slips into the cabaret "looking like a queen without a crown." No one is quite what they appear to be. We have a hero figure who looks like the jack of hearts, and two queens neither of whom are really queens. Rosemary only looks like a queen and "Lily was a princess." Her claim to the throne is blocked by the other queen. Jim, the apparent king, has a great deal to protect; weighed down with his silver cane and diamond mine, he is "no match for the Jack of Hearts," the Knave of hearts, the outlaw!
Reality and illusion, the eternal theme of great literature. Is what we see real? This ballad gives us so many references to ways of seeing. Jim is "staring into space" and both he and the Jack are "staring at the butterfly/Who just drew the Jack of Hearts" (7); and Rosemary, what is she doing? Rosemary is “seeing her reflection in the knife” and "gazing to the future,/Riding on the Jack of Hearts." We get many references to eyes or to what eyes do: see, stare, look, gaze, blink. This pattern of imagery extends the theme of appearance vs. reality. What is real and what is only appearance? It’s the most basic theme in literature—and one that runs through song after song by Dylan. It continues in Lily’s dressing room where she is stripping away the appearance she puts on when performing for the crowd:
Yes, everyone is an actor. All the world’s a stage and each of us…. But some of us are better than others, better actors I mean. And the ultimate actor, the best of them all, disguises himself as a religious figure it seems. Do we have another Christ-figure in the Jack of Hearts? Does he separate the sheep from the goats? Does he seek the lost sheep like a good shepherd? Does he appear and disappear mysteriously?
This song is being written as Berstein and Woodward are using hints from Deep Throat to write stories that ultimately force President Richard Nixon to resign. “Even the president of the United States sometimes must stand naked,” Dylan had written a decade earlier, as LBJ began to send more troops to Vietnam. I don’t mean to suggest that this 1975 ballad of Dylan’s, however, is a simple allegory with a one-to-one correlation; it is a richly symbolic ballad about deception and honesty. It shows us the corruption of “the system” being undermined by the outlaw figure who looks like a saint. Outlaws, precisely because they live outside the law, must be honest, honest with themselves. They don’t have the luxury of hypocrisy so common among those who hide behind the protection of the rules. It is those who lead protected lives who allow themselves to be dishonest even with themselves, such as those who preach that homosexuality is a sin while themselves secretly practicing “the love that dare not say its name.” But Dylan’s mythic story transcends any specific contemporary example. That’s what myth means.
The Jack of Hearts, is, in Dylan’s paradoxical turn of phrase, “on the scene missing.” He’s not there but, like Christ, very much present. That’s why Lily “most of all was thinkin’ ‘bout the Jack of Hearts.” He is, ultimately, the cause. Thanks to him Lily is stripping away her false appearance: she has restored her true hair color. It’s a poetic line, the only line Dylan sings rather than delivering in his own version of Sprechstimme: Yes, this is a ballad alright, telling us a mythic story which can be told and retold, each time giving us new insights. It leaves us, like Lily, thinkin’ ‘bout the Jack of Hearts. And the Jack is the American outlaw, the rebel who comes to free us, and who, like Shane, rides off alone at the end. Who, like Christ, is “on the scene missing.” ~CONCLUSION Next week I turn to another form which Dylan uses so well and, as with the ballad, transforms into something larger, even mythic: the love song. Yes, the love song. As with ballads, its not what we think of first when we think Bob Dylan. However, he wrote a lot love songs. More than half of his songs are, in one way or another, love songs, though many of those are not just plain love songs, some are mythic explorations of the human condition, some are about his relationship with his audience, some … But I’ll get to that next week, when I begin a two part series on love songs. Until then, I’m Bill King saying I’m so glad you came around. back to top
|
||||||||
| SHOWS | ABOUT | DYLAN | RESOURCES | CONTACT | SEARCH | SITEMAP | HOME © Shakespeare in the Alley, 2004. All Rights Reserved. Website by Juliana Harrisking |